Robert Haas escribió: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > But trying to VACUUM FULL that table is going to be horridly painful > > too, and you'll still have bloated indexes afterwards. You might as > > well just live with the 50% waste, especially since if you did a > > full-table update once you'll probably do it again sometime. > > > > I'm having a hard time believing that VACUUM FULL really has any > > interesting use-case anymore. > > What if your large table doesn't have an index? Then there's no way to > cluster. But there's nothing saying we cannot provide a version of CLUSTER that does not follow any index and just copies the live tuples. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
