On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Josh Berkus<j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 8/31/09 1:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I guess my premise is that if I use \d, I'm primarily interested in the >> column names and types. The view definition is secondary. If the view >> definition is a single line or uses a single table, it's interesting >> because it might describe something about the schema design, but if it's >> 20 lines it's an implementation detail. > > I agree with Peter here.
I think we should always or never show the view definition, not sometimes. And I also agree with Tom's point that we should fix the pager. The way that it works now is really annoying. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
