Josh Berkus wrote: > All, > > > Yeah, conference-based releases is just a proxy for time-based > > releases. It's nice to have something to be happy about at the > > conference too. And it's a convenient time to start talking about the > > next release when you're all face-to-face. > > On the one hand: > > I'd say that we go for the 3-CF release. I think we need to prove that > we can do a time-based release once before a lot of people on this list > will believe in it. > > If we do 4 CFs, we're in danger of still being in beta in late May ... > and once conference and vacation season start, things get a lot slower. > Mind you, it's possible that we can shorten the final CF and beta this > time, but I wouldn't want to count on it. > > If we *can* shorten them, then 8.6 can have 4CFs. But we won't know > until after we've done it. > > On the other hand: > > I think if we do another release without Standby/replication, we'll > start to lose a lot of users. People are waiting on that, and a lot of > folks were expecting it in 8.4.
That is a slightly alarmist. Who are we going to lose these users to? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
