On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:59:53PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2009/8/16 Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>:
> > On sön, 2009-08-16 at 00:04 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> SQL is not Lisp. Simple is  good. I didn't think Peter was really very
> >> serious.
> >
> > Well, I don't know if we really need to call it "lambda", but I fully
> > expect to be able to use these "ad hoc functions" as part of other
> > expressions.  So making DO or whatever a top-level command that does not
> > integrate with anything else would not really satisfy me.
> 
> +1

+1

-dg
 

-- 
David Gould       da...@sonic.net      510 536 1443    510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to