On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:59:53PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2009/8/16 Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>: > > On sön, 2009-08-16 at 00:04 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> SQL is not Lisp. Simple is good. I didn't think Peter was really very > >> serious. > > > > Well, I don't know if we really need to call it "lambda", but I fully > > expect to be able to use these "ad hoc functions" as part of other > > expressions. So making DO or whatever a top-level command that does not > > integrate with anything else would not really satisfy me. > > +1
+1 -dg -- David Gould da...@sonic.net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869 If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers