Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Is there a real downside to promoting the launcher to be a > >> pseudo-backend? > > > Aside from the fact that we don't have any pseudo-backend yet, I don't > > see any ... > > Well, I meant pseudo-backend in the sense of "just like an AV worker". > We might not want it to show in pg_stat_activity, but otherwise I think > it'd be the same.
Hmm, to what database would it connect? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers