Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Robert Haas<robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > But just to kick off the discussion, here is Heikki's review of Synch > Rep on 7/15: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00913.php > > I think the key phrases in this review are "I believe we have > consensus on four major changes" and "As a hint, I think you'll find > it a lot easier if you implement only asynchronous replication at > first. That reduces the amount of inter-process communication a lot." > I think this points to a need to try to reduce the scope of this patch > to something more manageable. Heikki also points out that major > change #4 was raised back in Decemeber, and I actually think #1 and #3 > were as well.
Thanks for clarifying the status. According to Heikki's advice, I'm working at asynchronous replication at first. I'll submit the patch by the next CommitFest at least. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
