Tom Lane wrote: > Peter pointed out upthread that the SQL standard already calls out some > things that should be available in this way --- has anyone studied that > yet?
Yeah, I gave it a look. It looks useful as a guide, though obviously not directly implementable because it relies on GET DIAGNOSTICS to have somewhere to store the diagnostics information into (a host variable, etc). They do define that there is a TABLE_NAME, etc. Not much else to report at the moment. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
