Tom Lane escribió: > However, I wonder whether we could turn this around. Instead of an > open-ended project to add an ill-defined collection of fields to an > ill-defined collection of error cases, maybe we could identify a > very short list of cases where it's known to be useful to pull a > specific bit of information out of a specific error message. And > then implement just those.
Hmm, yeah, it makes sense to look at the problem this way. > The bottom line behind my complaining is that this isn't going to be > helpful unless it's very clearly defined which error reports produce > what auxiliary fields. The impression I got from Alvaro's comments > was that he wanted to decorate everything in sight with anything he > could think of, which perhaps is not what he intended. Right :-( -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
