On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Kevin Grittner<kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > I wrote: > >> So far, all tests have shown no difference in performance based on >> the patch; > > My testing to that point had been on a "big" machine with 16 CPUs and > 128 GB RAM and dozens of spindles. Last night I tried with a dual > core machine with 4 GB RAM and 5 spindles in RAID 5. Still no > difference with the patch. > > Any suggestions besides the foreign keys? Should 488 FKs be enough to > matter here? (Barring better suggestions, I'll try the small machine > again tonight with the default configuration, rather than the > optimized one.)
The other possibility here is that this just doesn't work. :-) ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
