2009/7/27 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > (In fact, in a real sense these ARE join problems ... maybe we should > stop thinking of them as fire-a-bunch-of-triggers and instead think of > executing a single check query with appropriate WHERE clause ...) >
Hmm. Presumably that is the same WHERE clause as the UPDATE. But it has to execute after the update. How does it avoid re-executing functions, re-incrementing sequences, etc... ? - Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
