Alvaro Herrera írta: > Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > > >> The vague consensus for syntax options was that the GUC >> 'lock_timeout' and WAIT [N] extension (wherever NOWAIT >> is allowed) both should be implemented. >> >> Behaviour would be that N seconds timeout should be >> applied to every lock that the statement would take. >> > > In http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/291.1242053...@sss.pgh.pa.us > Tom argues that lock_timeout should be sufficient. I'm not sure what > does WAIT [N] buy. >
Syntax consistency with NOWAIT? -- Bible has answers for everything. Proof: "But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology. "May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH http://www.postgresql.at/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
