On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Pavan Deolasee<pavan.deola...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Robert Haas<robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Pavan, are you planning to respond to Alex's comments and/or update this >> patch? > > Yes, I will. Hopefully by end of this week.
Since it has now been 10 days since this patch was reviewed, I think that it is more than fair to move this from "Waiting on Author" to "Returned with Feedback". As I've said on other threads, we want to give everyone a fair chance to respond to review comments, but we also don't want to tie up reviewers indefinitely on patches that aren't being updated in a timely fashion, and we don't want to be left with a crush of patches that need to be re-reviewed at the very end of the CommitFest when suddenly everyone updates them. So I'm going to go make this change. I hope, though, that this will be resubmitted, after appropriate updating, for a future CommitFest. I haven't read the code so I can't speak at all to whether it works (in which I'm including crash-safe, deadlock-proof, and correct with respect to locking), but if so it sounds like a nice improvement. Thanks, ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
