Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> 
> I did some benchmarking with/without multibyte support using current.

...
 
> (2) pgbench
> 
> With multibyte support(first column is the concurrent user, second is
> the TPS):
...
> 32 95.947363
> 64 92.718780
> 128 61.725883
> 
> Witout multibyte support:
...
> 32 92.283645
> 64 86.936559
> 128 87.584099

Do you have any theory why multibyte passes non-mb at 128 ?

Some subtle timing thing perhaps (or just bad luck for non-mb at 128)?


-----------
Hannu

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to