Jean-Michel POURE wrote: > > Is this the way we should proceed with pgAdmin II? > Is anyone planning a real dependency table based on object STRING NAMES? > > We need some advice: > 1) Client solution: should we add the rebuilding feature to pgAdmin II? > 2) Server solution: should we wait until the ALTER OBJECT project is complete? > > Please advice. Help needed. > Vote for (1) or (2).
I vote for (2). It's the server's resposibitiy to ensure the db's consistency. regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
