On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: >> Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> I was just wondering idly today if we could usefully build a number of >>> indexes at the same time in a single pass over the heap, or could it be >>> that we wouldn't gain much? I haven't even got around to thinking about >>> any syntax for it. > >> Could we make it work on two backends building one index each in >> synchronized scans? > > Don't we more or less have that already?
Wasn't that a big part of the point of the "parallel pg_restore" feature? -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
