On Saturday 11 July 2009 17:37:03 andrzej barszcz wrote: > Well, best to write this way: > > Goal : query splitted to base elements > Result : xml response from server > Client : select pg_reparse_query(<query>); > Target: 8.4 version > > How : modification of ruleutiles.c > Not done : UNION etc. > Not done : as builtin function, I don't know how to do it ))) > Tested : partly
> Does it make sense ???? I think the lack of response indicates that to most people it doesn't. Maybe you can try to explain it a bit differently. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
