Andrew Dunstan wrote:
<...> > > branch | released | curr_version | curr_date | final_date > > --------+------------+--------------+------------+------------ > > 8.4 | 2009-07-01 | 8.4.0 | 2009-07-01 | > > 8.3 | 2008-02-04 | 8.3.7 | 2009-03-16 | > > 8.2 | 2006-12-05 | 8.2.13 | 2009-03-16 | > > 8.1 | 2005-11-08 | 8.1.17 | 2009-03-16 | > > 8.0 | 2005-01-19 | 8.0.21 | 2009-03-16 | > > 7.4 | 2003-11-17 | 7.4.25 | 2009-03-16 | 2009-09-01 (projected) > > 7.3 | 2002-11-27 | 7.3.21 | 2008-01-07 | 2008-01-07 > > 7.2 | 2002-02-04 | 7.2.8 | 2005-05-09 | 2005-05-09 > > 7.1 | 2001-04-13 | 7.1.3 | 2001-08-15 | 2001-08-15 > > 7.0 | 2000-05-08 | 7.0.3 | 2000-11-11 | 2000-11-11 > > > > > > Yeah, nice. I was thinking of a press release when we EOL a branch as well. You may want to indicate the dead-end of the 8.1 Windows variant as well. <http://www.postgresql.org/download/windows> says "Only PostgreSQL 8.2 and above are supported on Windows." ... might prevent confusion. Greg Williamson -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
