On Thursday 28 May 2009 20:03:38 Stephen Frost wrote: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > Right. Shall we try to spec out exactly what our conversion > > requirements are? Here's a shot: > > [...] > > > Comments? Other considerations? > > Certainly sounds reasonable to me. I'd be really suprised if that's > really all that hard to accomplish. I'd be happy to help with some > testing too if we feel that the current git repo is in reasonable shape > to do that testing against (or someone has another).
Sounds like writing a comprehensive test suite against Tom's spec would be the first step. And then this test suite can be run against various conversion tools and configurations thereof. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers