On Friday 29 May 2009 04:06:14 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Otherwise, I'm not too keen simply to throw Python 2.x overboard until > it's no longer common on platforms people are likely to want to install > Postgres on, if that's what's implied by the original question.
My guess is that we will need to keep around a Python 2.x version for at least another three years, meaning two or three major PostgreSQL releases. That also means that maintaining a separate, parallel code base for a Python 3 variant can only be acceptable if it gives major advantages. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
