Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I think it should use the %2$s style specifier in that case. This
> should work:
> printf (ngettext ("One file removed, containing %2$lu bytes",
> "%d files removed, containing %lu bytes", n),
> n, total_bytes);
How's that gonna work? In the n=1 case, printf would have no idea about
the type/size of the argument it would need to skip over.
I think maybe you could make it work like this:
printf (ngettext ("One file removed, containing %1$lu bytes",
"%2$d files removed, containing %1$lu bytes", n),
total_bytes, n);
but *for sure* I don't want us playing such games without a robust
compile-time check on both variants of the ngettext string. I'm
not real sure it's a good idea at all, because of the potential for
confusing translators. Notice also that we have subtly embedded the
preferred English phrase ordering here: if someone wants to pull the
same type of trick in a language where the bytecount ought to come
first, he's just plain out of luck.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
