On May 26, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:

On Monday 25 May 2009 18:02:53 Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
This is all much more complicated than what I proposed, and I fail to see what it buys us. I'd say that you're just reinforcing the point I made upthread, which is that insisting that XML is the only way to get
more detailed information will just create a cottage industry of
beating that XML output format into submission.

The impression I have is that (to misquote Churchill) XML is the worst option available, except for all the others. We need something that can represent a fairly complex data structure, easily supports addition or
removal of particular fields in the structure (including fields not
foreseen in the original design), is not hard for programs to parse,
and is widely supported --- ie, "not hard" includes "you don't have to
write your own parser, in most languages".  How many realistic
alternatives are there?

I think we are going in the wrong direction. No one has said that they want a machine-readable EXPLAIN format. OK, there are historically about three people that want one, but they have already solved the problem of parsing the current format. And without having writtens such a parser myself I think that
the current format is not inherently hard to parse.

What people really want is optional additional information in the human- readable format. Giving them a machine readable format does not solve the problem. Giving them a machine readable format with all-or-none of the optional information and saying "figure it out yourself" does not solve anything either. The same people who currently complain will continue to
complain.

Peter,

The check is in the mail. :-)

In all seriousness, I have no problem at all with providing machine- readable formats, but the problem you're describing here is definitely my primary pain point.

...Robert

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to