On May 8, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Well, you can see that with \d on the table, but IMHO this should be
present on \di too, so +1.
One gripe I had with \d and indexes the other day is that it sucks on
functional indexes -- it just says "pg_expression_1".
The gripe I have with \d is that the "footnotes" are very hard to
scan through once you have more than a few things on a table. What
I'd like to see is a version that provides the same information, but
in a tabular output.
Thoughts? I don't have time to submit a patch for this, but I could
probably get CashNetUSA to pay to have it done. :)
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect deci...@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
