Tom Lane wrote:
kind of :-(Have M$ really been stupid enough to make an external kill look just like an exit() call?regards, tom lane Everything i have read seems to point the Task Manager calls TerminateProcess() in the kernel32.dll and passes a 1 setting the exitcode to 1. I have not found anything clearly stating that, yet logic points that is what its doing. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms686714(VS.85).aspx Would it not be easy to set the normal exitcode to something other than 1 to see the difference ExitProcess() http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682658(VS.85).aspx this article maybe helpful. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms686722(VS.85).aspx BTW tested on Windows 2003 SP1 this problem shows up in Postgresql 8.3.3 |
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Magnus Hagander
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Alvaro Herrera
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Andrew Dunstan
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Magnus Hagander
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death justin
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Andrew Dunstan
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death justin
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Andrew Dunstan
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Magnus Hagander
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Magnus Hagander
- Re: [HACKERS] windows doesn't notice backend death Magnus Hagander