On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
I think there's a good case for some functions implementing the
various
Unicode normalization functions, though.
I have no objection to that so long as the code footprint is in line
with the utility gain (i.e. not all that much). If we have to bring
in
ICU or something similar to make it happen, the cost/benefit ratio
looks
pretty bad.
I've no idea what it would require, but the mapping table must be
pretty substantial. Still, I'd love to have this functionality in the
database.
Best,
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
