On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> > Josh Berkus wrote: >> >> All, >> >> >> >> > In any case, the release notes aren't normally a bottleneck. ?I still >> >> > think that Bruce had his priorities out of whack in not cleaning up >> >> > his open-items list before doing this. ?If he had done so, nobody >> >> > would have noticed how long the notes took. >> >> >> >> Yes, although Bruce *has* asked for help in cleaning up the open-items >> >> list. >> > >> > Uh, not now; ?I put up the list only so people wouldn't think I was >> > hiding things, and I said it wasn't cleaned up. ?What is so hard for >> > people to understand about that. ?This is quite annoying. >> >> If I understand correctly, you're saying that you didn't want to have >> help with the release notes, you don't want help cleaning up your >> mailbox, but you do want beta to wait until you are done doing those >> things and any resulting action items have been completed. Is that >> right? >> >> I don't think anyone thinks you're hiding anything, but I think there >> is a general desire to move this thing along as quickly as reasonably >> possible. > > And to answer your question about the release notes, Tom is right that > it probably has to be done by one person because it needs a consistent > voice, and someone has to get the entire release notes in their head so > they can see logical sections/groupings, etc. Once it is done, as it is > now, people can jump in and add improvements.
Fair enough. I'm just looking for a way to help out so we can get this done. I am not coming up with much that seems to be helpful. I was planning to do some comments on your mailbox file but Tom beat me to the punch. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
