On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:02:01PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > >> > >>> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > >>>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both? > >> > >>> That's already used: > >> > >>> -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches > >>> pg_dump version > >> > >> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely. > >> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts". > > > > +1. I was just thinking the same thing. > > +1, that sounds like a very good idea.
FWIW, +1 from me for removing the -i and -d options, leaving only long versions of what they used to do. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
