On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Marko Kreen <mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/9/09, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Marko Kreen <mark...@gmail.com> writes: >> > But now that I learned that ALTER TABLE WITHOUT OIDS either causes bugs >> > or requires table rewrite, it turned from minor annoyance to big >> annoyance. >> > So I'd like have a reasonable path for getting rid of them, which we don't >> > have currently. >> >> We've had SET WITHOUT OIDS since 7.3 or thereabouts. Anybody who hasn't >> applied it in all that time either does not care, or actually needs the >> OIDs and will be unhappy if we arbitrarily remove the feature. > > Sure I did not care. Because I thought I can get rid of them > anytime I wanted. But it seems it's not the case... > > We've set default_with_oids = false, for quite a long time. But there > are still tables remaining with oids. And this discussion showed it > now easy to get rid of them. > > I can patch Postgres myself, but I was thinking maybe others want also > some solution.
I must be missing something. Why would you need to patch PostgreSQL and how would it help you if you did? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers