On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eu...@timbira.com> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera escreveu: >>> (ii) I think we should change the expression "storage parameters" for >>> something else because autovacuum is related to maintenance. My suggestion >>> is >>> a general expression like "relation parameters"; >> >> I'm not sure I agree with this idea, because the term "storage >> parameter" has been used for several releases already. This would be a >> relatively major terminology change. >> > I don't buy your argument. 'fillfactor' is a _storage_ parameter but > 'autovacuum_enabled' is not. I don't like terminology changes too but in this > case it sounds strange calling autovacuum_* as storage parameters. >
+1 -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
