Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This is pretty much exactly how I see it. *Hot standby is not ready*,
> So can you give us an idea of what parts of the code are in need of
> rethinking etc? I assume you've looked at it now if you can estimate
> it's going to take another 10 -12 months?
No, I'm just estimating that based on the amount of design churn that's
still going on according to the mailing list discussions. I haven't
looked at the code at all. (If you expect me to sign off on it you can
figure it'll be a couple of months even for that to happen...)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
