Is there anything to do with the below issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pavan Deolasee wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > > > I think what you are suggesting is that we should set the visibility map > > bit while dead line pointers (tombstones) still remain. If that's what > > you meant it's a bad idea. > > No, I'm not suggesting that. I understand the problem there. I was > merely explaining how HOT-prune may some time (when there are no DEAD > line pointers created) help us set the visibility bit early. > > OTOH I think we can still set PD_ALL_VISIBLE page header flag even > when there are DEAD line pointers. > > Thanks, > Pavan > > -- > Pavan Deolasee > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
