* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Hm, how about just 'partition'? Your argument is fair, and another > point in its favor is that someday we'll probably have an explicit > notion of partitioned tables and both the inheritance and union-view > approaches would become legacy methods. We'd certainly want constraint > exclusion to apply to all three by default.
'partition' works for me.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
