> Surely the most important point in the OP was that ineqsel does not
> correctly binary search in the presence of duplicates.
>

It would have been if I were correct :-( .

Looking at it again, that was from a bug in my code. Thanks for your
time, and sorry about the noise.

-Nathan

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to