> Surely the most important point in the OP was that ineqsel does not > correctly binary search in the presence of duplicates. >
It would have been if I were correct :-( . Looking at it again, that was from a bug in my code. Thanks for your time, and sorry about the noise. -Nathan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers