On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:06 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, done (below). 'list' seems kind of redundant. Can we factor that > out somehow? > > Informational > Modifiers: S = show system objects + = Additional detail > \l[+] list all databases > \d[S+] list tables, views, and sequences > \d[S+] NAME describe table, view, sequence, or index > \da[S] [PATTERN] list aggregate functions > \db[+] [PATTERN] list tablespaces > \dc[S] [PATTERN] list conversions > \dC [PATTERN] list casts > \dd [PATTERN] show comment for object Per offline comments my thoughts were something like: Informational: S = show system objects + = Additional detail Display: \l[+] all databases \d[S+] tables, views, and sequences \d[S+] NAME describe table, view, sequence, or index \da[S] [PATTERN] aggregate functions \db[+] [PATTERN] tablespaces \dc[S] [PATTERN] conversions \dC [PATTERN] casts \dd [PATTERN] show comment for object \dd[S] [PATTERN] comments on objects But I am not putting up any sandbags :) Joshua D. Drake > -- PostgreSQL Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
