Tom Lane wrote:
However, if we do that then for consistency we'd have to invent
DROP WINDOW FUNCTION, ALTER WINDOW FUNCTION, RENAME WINDOW FUNCTION,
COMMENT ON WINDOW FUNCTION, yadda yadda, and insist that you refer
to a function properly (with or without WINDOW) in each one of these
commands. Which would be a real PITA to implement and document,
and I can't see that it's doing anything much for users either.
So I'm still leaning to the first way. Comments?
I don't know that this matters so much unless you're going to have a
seperate namespace for window functions. Otherwise, isn't WINDOW
basically a noise word for these operations?
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
