Thank you for your suggestions. I'm not totally against your suggestions (for example, I'm not against the idea that changing all current encoding names to more "standard" ones for 7.2 if it's your concern). However, I think we should focus on more fundamental issues than those trivial ones. Recently Thomas gave an idea how to deal with the internationalization (I18N) of PostgreSQL: create character set etc. I don't think I18N PostgreSQL will happen in 7.2, but we should tackle them in the near future in my opinion. -- Tatsuo Ishii ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- [HACKERS] Encoding names Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding names Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding names Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding names Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Encoding names Karel Zak
- [HACKERS] Re: Encoding names Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Encoding names Karel Zak
- [HACKERS] Re: Encoding name... Tatsuo Ishii
- [HACKERS] Re: Encoding name... Karel Zak
- [HACKERS] encoding names Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] encoding names Tom Lane