Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > And he who needs that kind of long term row identifiers would
> > > be better off with 8-byte sequences anyway - IMNSVHO.
> >
> > What I need is a way to pad the struct declaration so that it leaves
> > 8 bytes per int64 column, no matter what. I thought of
> >
> > This would work, I think, but my goodness it's an ugly solution.
> > Has any hacker got a better one?
>
> The only thing I could think of is using a struct to hide the
> padding details instead of directly using int64, but then you'd have to
> add a '.value' or something to the references. I'm not sure that's really
> any cleaner.
What I'm asking myself all the time is "which platforms do we
support that doesn't have 8-byte integers?". Could someone
enlighten me please?
And what does int8 do on these platforms?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
