Seems it would make more sense to just divide maintenance_work_mem by
the number of workers for autovacuum.
This sounds familiar. Didn't we already decide to do this once?
One concern I have about this is people asking "how come when I
runvacuum manually it takes x minutes but when autovacuum runs it it
tale 5x minutes?"
greg
On 2 Dec 2008, at 01:38 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it make sense to be able to configure maintenance_work_mem
specifically for the autovacuum processes? Given that there can be a
number of them, it might be good to be able to have one default for
all
*other* processes, and a separate one from the ones kicked off by
autovac?
//Magnus
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
