Guillaume Smet wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hm. People have complained of that fact from time to time in normal
usage as well. Should we simply change SIGINT handling to allow it to
cancel an idle transaction?
If this means that we would be able to able to easily rollback the
current transaction of a backend stuck in "idle in transaction"
status, a big +1.
Yes, I have had clients caught by this regularly (last time less than a
week ago), it would be a significant enhancement.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
