Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think we are on hold for Hiroshi, right? > > Yes. I believe I know which patch he's referring to --- it's the only > change in src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c since 7.1. If he hasn't committed > in a few hours I can take care of back-patching it. It must be pushing > midnight in Japan by now... That's a couple of days ago now... anything happening? -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? Marc G. Fournier