Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've already modified your patch a bit ... please send your updated > patch so I can merge it into mine. However, my changes were also > relatively minor. Since Tom wants it to be entirely rewritten then > maybe merging minor fixes to it is a waste of time ...
The thing I'm complaining about is having dropped the intermediate struct that represents the fully decoded set of reloptions. If you put that back I won't object to a table-driven approach to doing the decoding. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers