Magnus Hagander wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>> We're definitely *not* fortify-clean, although maybe trying to become so >>>> would be a good idea. From memory, what I have seen in past builds on >>>> Red Hat systems is a lot of warnings about ignoring the return value >>>> from fwrite() and related functions. >>> So. Should I revert it? >> I dunno. Was that the only such warning you got on your build? That >> would be a bit odd given that I see many more ... > > Yeah, it happens in more places. I wasn't doing a make clean first, so > that was the only one of the files that were built *that time* that gave > the warning. I see it in more places now. > > I think I'll go figure out how to turn fortify off :-)
Actually, better not. That's what caught that string format bug after all... //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
