Tom Lane wrote: > > Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I guess that the change of OID from 4 to 8 bytes could be carried out > > as a compile time option ? > > Not unless you like the notion that the wire protocol depends on a > compile time option. That could be a separate option, perhaps even a runtime one. And yet another flag for determining weather to raise an error on wire-oid overflow or just to masquerade it as rollower ;) -------------- Hannu ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Fernando Nasser
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Fernando Nasser
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tatsuo Ishii