On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 13:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> 2. Also need to decide whether we want pg_class.reltriggers as int2 (as > >>> implemented here) or switch to relhastriggers as boolean. > >> > >> I'd go for changing the column name/type. Yeah, you will break any > >> clients that are still trying to manipulate reltriggers directly, but > >> better to break them obviously than non-obviously. And I think a silent > >> change in the column semantics has significant risk of the latter. > > > New version with column type change. > > I'm starting to review this now. It strikes me that while we are at it, > we should get rid of the useless pg_class columns relukeys, relfkeys, > and relrefs. These haven't been maintained since Berkeley days, and > this patch puts the final kibosh on any thought that we'd ever start > to maintain relukeys and relfkeys counts. > > Any objections?
None here. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
