Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've started reviewing this patch for commit, and I find myself a bit
>> disturbed by its compatibility properties. The SQL_STANDARD output
>> style is simply ambiguous: what is meant by
>> -1 1:00:00
>> ? What you get from that will depend on the intervalstyle setting at
>> the recipient.
> Nope. The SQL Standard style avoids the ambiguity by following
> the SQL Standard's rules when the input value complied with the
> standard's restrictions on intervals.
You're missing the point: the same string can mean different things
to different recipients depending on their intervalstyle setting.
This means it's unsafe to use that representation in pg_dump output,
unless we take steps to force the interpretation.
> Are you concerned about someone dumping in SQL_STANDARD mode and
> then importing in POSTGRES mode?
Exactly.
> If so, how's the similar case handled with date order?
ISO date format is read the same regardless of recipient's datestyle,
so pg_dump solves this by forcing the dump to be made in ISO style.
The corresponding solution for intervals will be to dump in POSTGRES
style, not SQL_STANDARD style, which seems a bit unfortunate.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
