Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to get [vacuumlo] included in the main vacuumdb program for
> support to vacuum orphaned large objects?
Hmm. I'm not convinced that vacuumlo is ready for prime time...
in particular, how safe is it in the presence of concurrent
transactions that might be adding or removing LOs?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
