Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> God, no. GUC is hopelessly complex already, we should *not* try to make
>> it track different values of a parameter for different tables.
> Are there any more specific reasons than "it's very complex"?
That one seems quite sufficient to me; but consider dump/restore if you
need more.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
