Hi, Josh Berkus wrote: > So it sounds like intagg is still in use/development. But ... is it > more of an example, or is it useful as a type/function in production?
We use it in production for quite remarkable speedups of operations on int4[]. Having reviewed the last commit fest's intagg patch as well, I thought we agreed that a more general functionality is wanted for core. But as long as we don't have that, I'd like intagg to stay in contrib. Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
