Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any objections to dropping both of these?
You should ask on -general, not here, if you are trying to find out
whether the modules have any users.
I tend to agree that chkpass is of doubtful value, but I'm not so sure
about intagg. As you said yourself, we haven't yet replaced its
functionality with a generalized substitute. Also, it's the only
example in the current codebase of a useful technique, ie, an aggregate
function doing its own memory management.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
