Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Well, why is that a bug? If the platform is so silly as to define text >> files that way, who are we to argue?
> The problem is that our pg_controldata might have binary values that > contain 0x1a that will be confused by the operating system as > end-of-file. pg_controldata is certainly already being read as binary. The discussion here is about *text* files, particularly configuration files. Why should we not adhere to the platform standard about what a text file is? If you need a positive reason why this might be a bad idea, consider the idea that someone is examining postgresql.conf with a text editor that stops reading at control-Z. He might not be able to see items that the postmaster is treating as valid. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers