"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think everyone agrees that partial vacuums would be useful / *A Good > Thing* but it's the implementation that is the issue.
I'm not sure how important it will really be once we have support for
dead-space-map-driven vacuum.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
